On Feb. 27, 2012, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment eliminating same-sex marriage, was unconstitutional, which could, supporters hope, open the door for same-sex couples to once again marry in California.

There are always two sides to every argument, but in the case of Proposition 8, one of those sides was decidedly wrong.

The overturning of Proposition 8 isn’t just a win for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community, but a win for all Americans who believe in the fundamental idea that all people are created equal.

“The more recognition the LGBT community can get from mainstream culture is a win for them as well as a win for everyone,” said City College psychology Professor Dr. Gayle Pitman.

This element in kamagra tablets has been the most facilitating pdxcommercial.com cialis professional for sale features of the Kamagra ED pills. The requirement does not apply to certain card plans, such as those with variable rates based on a benchmark like the prime rate or an expiring promotional rate cialis australia online that was disclosed upfront. purchasing here buy cheap levitra The problem relates to getting new molecules through Prescription Only Medicine and should be taken after consulting a medical professional. viagra cheap prescription In fact, studies have reported that men who stopped smoking and limited their alcohol intake have experienced a great sexual relationship together and see lovemaking session as a fundamental part of their interaction. According to Pitman, typically when civil rights legislation is in the forefront of media attention, public opinion tends to follow.

Proposition 8, which California voters approved as a ballot initiative in 2008, attempted to deny a minority of citizens, the LGBT community, the right to happiness and to place them on a tier beneath traditional married couples, which is an affront to all those who cherish the constitution.

The government should be encouraging couples, whether same sex or opposite sex, to marry and build strong, productive lives together—not making it more difficult for couples to have their marriages recognized as legitimate in the eyes of the law. We should stop pandering to those few who are ignorant about the definition of equality or are offended by a lifestyle choice that is none of their business
The real question now is what parameters we as a community use to define a marriage.
Marriage itself should be defined by the couple and not the institution, by the love two people have for each other, the commitment couples share between themselves and the respect that two people have for one another. These values are shared by all couples who find themselves in love and are not mutually exclusive to any defined sexual orientation.

Though Proposition 8 proponents will likely try to appeal this ruling all the way to the Supreme Court, we as a society can either embrace the idea that same-sex couples have as much right to marry as traditional opposite-sex couples, or we can continue this argument that has done nothing but drive a wedge between the citizens of this nation, splitting us in two.